Simulate before you commit.
Explore how evidence, missing documents, intended use, location and buyer context may change the questions that matter before an Italian property decision.
Remove one source. The conclusion changes.
- Pass
No conclusion may be issued about an unidentified property.
Identity resolved from a tier-A record.
- Pass
Every claim must carry the source that produced it.
6 active claims, 6 attributed sources.
- Open
Contradictions are preserved, never averaged away.
83 m² (tier A) against 92 m² (tier D). Both retained; no single surface may be asserted.
- Pass
A blocking gap must be named before a price is defended.
Conformity statement and filed building notice both present.
- Pass
Evidence state may never exceed the strongest active tier.
Ceiling set by the strongest active source.
- Pass
A price position requires documented market evidence.
Nine recorded transfers support a price band.
KOSMOS blocked the conclusion.
Rule K3 refuses a single asserted surface while two sources disagree.
Every value above is recomputed from the switches. No video, no recording.
- Evidence collected
- Signals discovered
- Confidence changes
- Missing information
- Contradictions
- Professional review recommended
- Decision Workspace
The evidence state can regress. Watch what happens at the contradiction.
Deterministic worked example on a fictional property, built on real Italian decision patterns. No real property analysed, no source queried, no professional has reviewed a real case.
- 1.Role
- 2.Scenario
- 3.Questions
- 4.Readiness Map
Who are you?
The Simulator adapts to your context.